Using v0 to fast track stakeholder alignment

When I first started using v0, I was working on a project I can’t show publicly yet. So the dashboard you’ll see in this article is a simplified reconstruction (a stand in for the real thing). The visuals are edited, the data is fake, but the workflow is the same.

And honestly, the workflow is the real story.

I didn’t come to v0 as an expert. I learned it the way most people learn new tools today, through internet apprenticeship: watching Raymmar vibe code layouts in minutes, picking up prompt discipline from 0xDesigner, realizing I should pay attention to details because TJ Pitre said so. Then figuring out how to translate those lessons into my own context.

This article is really a lab notebook about that process: how I designed with an AI partner, what worked, where it broke, and what I learned from rebuilding the same screens over and over again until the structure finally clicked.

The project I built was a benchmarking and predictive modeling tool in the fintech space. Imagine a dashboard with a lot of filters and a lot of data that you can navigate through.

My goal wasn’t to ship production code. I wanted to test something much simpler and much harder:

• Could I move from idea → interface fast and light?
• Could I use conversational exploration to shape UI structure without losing design intent?
• Could I validate flows with a realistic prototype before engineering touched anything?

v0 became a space to answer those questions.

---

My Lab Notes

These are notes from the field talking about the things I found myself doing over and over until they became a pattern. All of the following started because I saw a random tweet of someone doing this.

1. Start with a visual anchor

The biggest unlock: v0 copies visual context better than language input.

If I gave it a blank prompt like “build me a dashboard with filters,” I got something extremely default. But if I pasted even a rough Figma screenshot with messy spacing, placeholder text and all, it understood structure and the information architecture better.

It doesn’t need a perfect design. It should be clear

2. Work in tiny deltas

Changing one thing at a time became my survival strategy.

If I asked for three edits at once, something always blew up. The padding often went rogue, a div floated away, and once, v0 decided the best solution was to transform my entire sidebar into a modal. Micro prompts kept things (and me) sane.

And when I needed layout level adjustments, the design mode was cleaner than prompting. Small global tweaks propagate unpredictably, so I learned to isolate changes as much as possible.

3. Keep the context pool clean

This was a hard lesson.

Each v0 chat becomes its own memory world. If I kept adding new features in the same conversation, the model started mixing up what it was supposed to. Random components reappeared from two hours ago, resurrected like ghosts.

So I started treating chats like components:

• one feature per thread
• branch from a version that works
• assemble everything at the end

Context management is important.

4. Point with pictures

Annotated screenshots were magic! v0 can read your notes through OCR, so things like:

• “Tighten spacing here”
• “This state should be blue and clickable”
• “Move this search bar above the filters”

landed perfectly when I pointed directly at the UI. It’s the closet I felt to co-designing with v0.

5. Restore, don’t repair

If something breaks, go backward, not forward.

Once, a single prompt asking for a small change somehow collapsed my entire layout. Cards resized unpredictably. The page scrolled horizontally. Even the footer mutated.

I spent 20 minutes trying to fix it before realizing the best move was to restore the previous version. Debugging through prompting is rarely worth it.

6. Treat v0 like a prototype, not a product

This is where expectations matter.

v0 is perfect for:

• showing flows
• simulating interactions
• running quick usability checks
• giving stakeholders something touchable

But not for production quality.

Once I validated the flow and go ahead, it had to be coded with a more controlled tool/ environment.

7. If you start from zero, expect very default UI

The default v0 look with shadcn is clean but generic. If you want something closer to your system, add Figma references early. The sooner the model sees your patterns, the more consistent your outputs.

8. Prototype pragmatically

Complex interactions like dependent dropdowns, live data, and real time updates can be abstracted in the prototype. Early on, I tried to force v0 to nail every detail. That was a trap. I learnt that:

Flow > fidelity.

Prototype > polish/ perfection.

If I needed clarity, I added a note in the interface like on click, this would expand. Arrows on Figma screenshots help. AI doesn’t mind rough edges. Stakeholders don’t either when the goal is understanding behavior, not evaluating final polish.

---

Would I use v0 again?

Yes! I would use it to build fast and try not to get caught in minor iterations. v0 is great for:

• Fast, test only flows: Turn static screens into clickable prototypes instantly.
• Early signal: Validate task clarity without full builds.
• Stakeholder demos: It looks real enough to tell the story.
• Trying variants: Explore multiple branches with almost no cost.

What I wouldn’t use it for, now that I have explored it:

• Pixel level craft: Typography, spacing, and polish require extra effort. I am currently exploring Figma MCP > Cursor for this.
• Strict design system fidelity: It struggles with anything beyond shadcn.
• Responsive confidence: Breakpoints can drift or collapse.
• You can’t co design with it smoothly.
• Daily design workflows: It is expensive for a tool that takes long to respond the way you need it to.
• Also, v0 takes time to generate. Instead of waiting, I used that window to:
  • write my next prompt
  • capture a screen to annotate
  • outline the next flow
  • check emails. The rhythm becomes conversational: v0 thinks → you think → v0 thinks → you think. It changed the tempo of my design process.

What Designing With v0 Changed for Me

At the end of the day, I used this and my original Figma designs both for the dev handoff, but the efficient validation from my stakeholders was a big win. Using v0 sped up my prototyping and stakeholder alignment time. It shifted how I think about the relationship between language and layout. About how much structure can be shaped by words. About when to embrace unpredictability and when to rein it back in.

It made design feel more conversational by making it less about the UI and more about describing constraints and flows. It let me prototype in the “final medium” early on, and with less friction. And maybe most importantly, it reminded me that iterating with imperfect tools is still one of the best ways to grow as a designer.